From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendation: which is best |
Date: | 2007-09-11 13:36:53 |
Message-ID: | 46E699F5.1040609@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/07 07:55, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> On 11/09/2007, Franz(dot)Rasper(at)izb(dot)de <Franz(dot)Rasper(at)izb(dot)de> wrote:
>> It depends what you want to do with your database.
>>
>> Do you have many reads (select) or a lot of writes (update,insert) ?
>
>
> This one will be a hugely INSERT thing, very low on UPDATEs. The
> INSERTS will have many TEXT fields as they are free form data. So the
> database will grow very fast. Size will grow pretty fast too.
15000 rows/day times 365 days = 5475000 rows.
How big are these rows? *That* is the crucial question.
>> You should use a hardware raid controller with battery backup write cache
>> (write cache should be greater than 256 MB).
>
>
> I'll have a raid controller in both scenarios, but which RAID should
> be better: RAID1 or RAID10?
The striping aspects of RAID10 makes sequential reads and writes and
large writes much faster.
The more spindles you have, the faster it is.
If you are *really* concerned about speed, 4 x 147GB 10K SCSI
>> How much memory do you have ?
>
>
> 4GB to begin with..
>
>
>> How big is your database, tables ... ?
>
>
> Huge, as the two main tables will each have about ten TEXT columns
> each. They will have about 15000 new entries every day, which is quite
> a load, so I believe we will have to partition it at least by month
> but even so it will grow at a huge pace.
15000 in an 8 hour window is 31.25 inserts/minute or ~2 seconds/insert.
If the records are 30MB each, then that could cause some stress on
the system in that 8 hour window.
If they are 3MB each, not a chance.
> While we are at it, would postgres be any different in performance
> across a single-CPU Quad Core Xeon with a dual CPU dual-core AMD
> Opteron? Or should the hard disk and RAM be the major considerations
> as usually proposed?
Opteron is the standard answer.
What is your backup/recovery strategy?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG5pn1S9HxQb37XmcRAnl1AJ48p5CGBMma15yWt9FtD0bOXN/D7ACeNxxq
9EWbm10L/Zt/tB1xPly/Ex0=
=QPI1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-11 14:16:37 | Re: Partial index with regexp not working |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2007-09-11 13:19:57 | Re: Time Zone design issues |