From: | Avery Payne <apayne(at)pcfruit(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A Silly Idea for Vertically-Oriented Databases |
Date: | 2007-09-07 22:38:58 |
Message-ID: | 46E1D302.9030803@pcfruit.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre><font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Avery,
<my ramblings snipped>
>If someone writes the rest of the code, I doubt the syntax will be the
>holdup. But writing an efficient C-store table mechanism is much harder
>than I think you think it is; Vertica worked on it for a year and failed,
>and Paraccel took two years to succeed. FYI, Paraccel is based on
>Postgres.
>So, put up a pgfoundry project and start hacking a c-store table; I'm sure
>you;ll get interest if you can make something work.
>--
>--Josh
Well, I did say it was a *crazy* idea. :-)
Given that I would be starting from the ground-floor, learning not only
the innards of PostgreSQL but also C coding as well, I would probably
have to overcome near-insurmountable odds to make this project take off. Still,
if I was crazy enough to think it, maybe I'll be crazy enough to
try for it. ;-)
Just ignore my 2nd posting, I was trying to clarify some of the
ramblings I was typing.
</font></font></pre>
</body>
</html>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/html | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-08 00:46:26 | Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-07 22:15:41 | Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch? |