From: | Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: an other provokative question?? |
Date: | 2007-09-07 18:01:31 |
Message-ID: | 46E191FB.40401@burntmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote:
> the idea of one database approach always being right
> just isn't true anyway.
Or one software development approach or one application runtime approach
or ... . One of the major contributions of the relational model
compared to the myriad network model implementations prevalent at the
time was that the relation model was a straightforward approach whose
theory was easily grasped and applied. The model made *people* more
productive; certainly, network implementations could run circles around
the early relational implementations, so it didn't make database servers
more productive.
Any alternative DBMS approach would have to provide a similar level of
human productivity. Given relational's staying power over the
intervening 25+ years (with many more people available to research
alternatives and much more available computing power), that appears to
be a significant challenge.
--
Guy Rouillier
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2007-09-07 18:01:47 | Re: Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns? |
Previous Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-09-07 17:32:10 | Re: What is the best way to merge two disjoint tables? |