From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
Date: | 2007-09-06 16:06:20 |
Message-ID: | 46E0257C.9040609@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pruning is going to take place on next vacuum anyway, isn't it?
>
> AFAIUI the point is that you can't do cleanup selectively only on UPDATE
> because of pointers that your process may already have to the page,
> which is why you wanted to do it on every heap_fetch. I suggest it is
> optimization which can be left for a later version (8.4?)
Wait, did you mean that we don't do pruning at all in 8.3? That's a bad
idea, the main purpose of HOT is to be able to vacuum page at a time,
reducing the need to do regular vacuums.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-09-06 16:26:45 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2007-09-06 16:03:57 | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |