From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |
Date: | 2007-09-06 11:08:19 |
Message-ID: | 46DFDFA3.4000000@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
apoc9009 wrote:
> I wish to have an Solution, thadt backup my Database DB wihout
> Datalosses, without locking Tables, without Shutdown
> and without any User must be forced for logging out (Backup in
> Production State Online without Datalosses).
"Without datalosses" is utopy. For that, you'd need something like
synchronous replication, otherwise you're always going to have a window
where you have something committed in the server, but not yet in the
backup. So it's just a question of how wide that window is, how much
data loss can you live with.
With file-based log shipping, you can get down to 1 second, by using the
archive_timeout setting. It will produce a lot of log files with very
little content in them, but they will compress well.
The record-based log shipping will give you a very narrow window, down
to < 1 second or even less if you're willing to poll the server that
often, but requires some custom development.
I wonder, do you really need such a super real time backup solution,
when you have the remote SAN? Don't you trust that the SAN hardware?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-09-06 11:11:54 | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |
Previous Message | apoc9009 | 2007-09-06 10:53:59 | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |