| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andy Astor <andy(dot)astor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-09-02 20:24:15 |
| Message-ID: | 46DB1BEF.8000007@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Nah, that is just laziness on my side. And I'm only a 6'1'' european
> bloke.
Oh? you look taller in real life. Or maybe I'm shrinking.
> Maybe I should change the spelling to Yann when I apply for
> citizenship?
:-)
> We don't have the choice of doing nothing, because not changing back to
> Postgres means you have to accept Postgre. And that's not exactly
> "nothing" to me. It turns my guts upside down, but it is what seems
> logically our name, so it has every right to be officially accepted.
Damn you and your logic!! You're right of course, but it doesn't mean I
have to like it :-)
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-09-02 21:48:08 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-02 20:21:06 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-03 15:19:43 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-09-02 18:13:06 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |