Re: All Wisconsin Circuit Courts now using PostgreSQL

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: All Wisconsin Circuit Courts now using PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-08-31 21:23:20
Message-ID: 46D84077.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 5:39 AM, in message
<20070831103900(dot)GQ14845(at)svr2(dot)hagander(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't know exactly how much it'd take, but I would *love* to see this as
> a "proper case study" on our website. I know we already have a couple of
> quotes in the archive, but a complete case study would be even better.
> WOuld that be doable?

I'll poke around and see what other case studies look like. I'm pretty sure
management would not approve it as "on the clock" work, but if the effort is
within reasonable bounds, I'll do it on my own time.

Our situation is going to be pretty atypical, though, because we have our
own framework for development and production, and when we needed to redo it,
management asked that we do whatever we felt necessary to make the new
version independent of both the back end database and the OS. With that
framework we may have had an easier time moving to a new database product
than many will.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2007-08-31 22:07:54 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2007-08-31 21:09:43 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)