Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:03, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Color me dense, but "what?", do you mean do I think the project should
>> change its name or not?
>
> You say that the name change is significant to you. What does that mean?

I still don't understand what you are asking. I never said it was
significant to me, I said:

Hello,

Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I
disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt
owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org)

Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will
note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility
that we may do so.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> I'm asking about all those wonderfull legal and business issues that must be dealt with if this hits the proverbial fan vis a vis Command Prompt and the community at large.
>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1HQVATb/zqfZUUQRAqaBAKCgIn2PH0tmklZTBfB6lqUWDTfllgCfaymj
CT3z4gHxqRab4shQ3Qr3Mu8=
=H+/d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----