| From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Testing the other tsearch dictionaries |
| Date: | 2007-08-28 15:49:49 |
| Message-ID: | 46D4441D.2040007@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> No, we have the ability to run a contrib module that's already been
>> installed. pg_regress cannot assume it has write privileges on
>> $SHAREDIR --- consider the "make installcheck" case.
>
> How big are these files? If small, is there a reason we can't actually
> ship them as samples?
We do. Currently they have a ".sample" suffix. Admin is supposed to make
a copy of them, modify, and save with the right suffix. Tom suggested
that we rename them so that they can be used directly.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-28 16:12:03 | Re: Insufficient attention to security in contrib (mostly) |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2007-08-28 15:44:14 | Re: One database vs. hundreds? |