| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-08-28 15:30:51 |
| Message-ID: | 46D43FAB.2060308@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Bernier a écrit :
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:06, Dave Page wrote:
>> Decibel! wrote:
>>> I think we can just as easily make the change without any real fanfare
>>> at all.
>> I'm inclined to agree. For the most part we could all just slowly change
>> things to 'Postgres'. I doubt anyone would really notice, except we'd
>> get fewer people getting it wrong!
>
> How about a vote?
>
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0' reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work involved out of the debate for the moment)?
>
I don't.
--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-08-28 15:36:13 | Re: mysql proxy |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-08-28 15:24:45 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |