From: | btober(at)ct(dot)metrocast(dot)net |
---|---|
To: | Kamil Srot <kamil(dot)srot(at)nlogy(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kynn Jones <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] One database vs. hundreds? |
Date: | 2007-08-28 12:57:11 |
Message-ID: | 46D41BA7.1070308@ct.metrocast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
(On the GENERAL list) Kamil Srot wrote:
>
> Kynn Jones wrote:
>> I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question ...
>
>
> ...we use pgsql partitioning for other reasons
> and it has some of the features you want (data separation, query
> performance, ...).
> It can be worth reading:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html
I'm not sure the tip is really what the OP is going to need -- I think
he has a different problem in mind than that addresses -- but after a
quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! Postrgresql was
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually
astounded by learning new features and techniques made available by the
continuing work of the development team.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-28 12:58:44 | Re: INSERT doc discrepancy |
Previous Message | Josh Trutwin | 2007-08-28 12:53:13 | Indexing Foreign Key Columns |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-28 14:28:24 | Re: Testing the other tsearch dictionaries |
Previous Message | Kevin Kempter | 2007-08-28 12:47:29 | Re: One database vs. hundreds? |