Re: MSVC build system

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MSVC build system
Date: 2007-08-27 18:03:46
Message-ID: 46D31202.5030502@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 11:00 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> In the longer run I want to make the whole system more data driven, so
>> that it's comparatively easy for someone to add stuff.
>>
>
> I don't mean to hijack your thread, but I wonder if maintaining two
> separate build systems is the best approach in the long term. I think
> CMake[1] is an interesting alternative: it would allow us to generate
> both makefiles and MSVC .proj's from a single set of master build files.
>
> -Neil
>
> [1] http://www.cmake.org
>
>

I would be more than happy if we had a single build system. Maybe some
enterprising person would like to try to create such a system as a proof
of concept. I count around 200 makefiles in our sources ;-)

Of course, we'd need to know that cmake was pretty universally available
too.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-08-27 18:21:59 Re: [WIP PATCH] Lazily assign xids for toplevel Transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-27 17:59:58 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the