| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Date: | 2007-08-23 08:51:12 |
| Message-ID: | 46CD4A80.8060908@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tony Caduto wrote:
> Check it out here:
>
> http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb
Couple of corrections Tony:
- You don't necessarily need to stop the postmaster to take a filesystem
backup -
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-BASE-BACKUP.
Obviously that assumes logs will be replayed during recovery.
- The native win32 port will run on FAT32, we just prevent the installer
from initdb'ing on such a partition. You can do it manually however, but
tablespaces won't work.
I'm a little puzzled about why you list multi-threaded architecture as a
feature - on Windows it's a little more efficient of course, but the
multi-process architecture is arguably far more robust, and certainly
used to be more portable (I'm not sure that's still the case for
platforms we actually care about).
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ow Mun Heng | 2007-08-23 08:57:04 | Re: reporting tools |
| Previous Message | Franz.Rasper | 2007-08-23 08:46:04 | Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of in ternal cache & dedicated battery |