From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures |
Date: | 2007-08-18 16:29:23 |
Message-ID: | 46C71E63.4050903@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/07 11:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Josh Tolley wrote:
>> On 8/18/07, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Interesting. Does PG have to initiate the Perl interpreter every
>>> time you call a Perl-written SP?
>> IIRC PostgreSQL should only load the perl interpreter once per session.
>
> Right.
I'd have been stunned if you did it any other way.
So why is Perl-SP-INSERT so much slower than Perl-SQL-INSERT?
(I can imagine that the SP code path would be longer, but since IO
is the slowest part of the system, I'm surprised that it's *that*
much slower.)
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGxx5jS9HxQb37XmcRAn1vAKCEWTovgcj/w/uFVK0nankGdbOFuACg6HSq
dUnMN0dPsdQ8NKSDW0EahcU=
=P8gN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ruediger.papke | 2007-08-18 16:31:03 | waiting in pg_stats_activity |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-18 16:20:42 | Re: SUBSTRING performance for large BYTEA |