From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Blobs in Postgresql |
Date: | 2007-08-18 14:53:47 |
Message-ID: | 46C707FB.1000906@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/07 23:16, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Ron Olson <tachoknight(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The language is Java. I've made some tests and they work very well for 25meg
>> files....works exactly the way it should, first time. MySQL had all kinds of
>> nasty surprises for me when I first started working with blobs, but I can
>> say that I took my code, changed the driver, and it all works like a champ
>> (mind you, this was a quick test app).
>>
>> I haven't looked at encryption at the database level....is such a thing
>> available? I know Oracle has some form of data encryption at the database
>> level so the nefarious DBA with the wide mustache and black brimmed hat
>> always going "ah ha ha ha ha" can't make off with the data, but does
>> Postgres have something similar?
>>
>> BTW, to put into context, the database will be designed to hold evidence
>> (well, photos and videos of). Thus the compelling need for some security, as
>> well as the variation in file sizes.
>
> Well, my assumption was that you would encrypt the data on the client
> side and store it that way.
>
> PostgreSQL has open architecture. If you wanted to do the encryption
> on the server, one possible approach that jumps out at me is to write
> a small C function which receives the data, encrypts the image using a
> key sent by the client all (but not stored), and either stores the
> encrypted image back in the database via SPI or writes it out to a
> file.
>
> There are many strategies to encrypting data...first thing to think
> about is where the encryption happens, where the keys are stored, etc.
Client-side encryption is important, because with server-side
encryption, you are sending the Valuable Data across the wire (or,
even worse!) wireless in cleartext form.
It's more likely that there's a packet sniffer on the network than
an Evil DBA snooping around.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGxwf7S9HxQb37XmcRAimGAJ98Kykormb63BedYknIij2xZvDgEACgw23C
eWn7JJKSs1KL9dSfVx3p/BY=
=OLl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-08-18 14:55:23 | Re: Transactional DDL |
Previous Message | Vance Maverick | 2007-08-18 12:36:54 | SUBSTRING performance for large BYTEA |