| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactional DDL |
| Date: | 2007-08-15 06:29:27 |
| Message-ID: | 46C29D47.4060805@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/07 00:05, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> And this feature i.e. transactional DDL is not there in other major
> RDBMS like sql server, oracle etc?
Define "major". Does it mean "popular" or "used on very large systems"?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGwp1GS9HxQb37XmcRAtdIAKC+7kG6K4WVxgGGSVT/AHcWCo6I8gCfZ9y5
bVcXkbWY4E9OzYss8g1i7Q4=
=/dqV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris | 2007-08-15 06:35:10 | Re: Transactional DDL |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-08-15 06:28:37 | Re: Transactional DDL |