Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?
Date: 2007-08-15 06:02:28
Message-ID: 46C296F4.5070806@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> So I'd say your strategy looks good - backup and remove the phony tag.
>> I'd also say we should probably be logging tag commands in taginfo.
>> Presumably we mere mortal committers should not be doing any tagging
>> whatsoever, and tags should only be applied in preparation for releases.
>
> +1 ... we should at least log such commands, and maybe disallow to anyone
> except Marc's "pgsql" account. Particularly since they don't get
> reported in pgsql-committers messages (or is that something we
> can/should change?)
>

I think you can, by sticking a command in the taginfo command. It's the
same script that Marc is using to try to restrict who can do it - once
he has that working, it should be as simple as adding a mail command to
the end of that script.

And +1 on doing it.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-08-15 06:10:47 Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2007-08-15 06:01:24 is this trigger safe and efective? - locking (caching via triiggers)