| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MVCC cons |
| Date: | 2007-08-15 01:59:34 |
| Message-ID: | 46C25E06.9000709@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/07 20:36, Merlin Moncure wrote:
[snip]
>
> PostgreSQL wins in terms of better concurrency (especially in long
> transactions or transactions that touch a lot of records), cheap
> rollbacks, and all the advantages of a sophisticated locking engine
> (transactional ddl for example).
Although MVCC is not a /sine qua non/ of transactional ddl.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGwl4GS9HxQb37XmcRAhm5AJ9pSZR08Vj5aOYtMnQdQaPsjtPMOQCghP+v
k81CxBZyH/42wHjPeT0Azvc=
=WRv0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-15 02:06:01 | Re: Trigger not working as expected, first row gets a null value |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-15 01:57:32 | Re: more select-for-update questions |