Re: MVCC cons

From: Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: RPK <rpk(dot)general(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MVCC cons
Date: 2007-08-14 19:34:51
Message-ID: 46C203DB.7030605@secdat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Speaking as an end-user, I can give only one I've ever seen, which is
>> performance. Because of MVCC, Postgres's write performance (insert and
>> update) appears on my systems to be almost exactly linear to row size.
>> Inserting 1000 rows into a table with row size 100 characters takes
>> twice as long as inserting 1000 rows into a table with row size 50
>> characters.
>>
>
> Not sure why you'd think that's specific to MVCC. It sounds like purely
> an issue of disk write bandwidth.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

I did not see this in MS SQL Server.

--
Kenneth Downs
Secure Data Software, Inc.
www.secdat.com www.andromeda-project.org
631-689-7200 Fax: 631-689-0527
cell: 631-379-0010

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phoenix Kiula 2007-08-14 19:35:01 Compound Indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-14 19:30:47 Re: MVCC cons