From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs |
Date: | 2003-05-14 09:09:44 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961FAD@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Binary-encoded numeric values don't go through
> encoding conversion. Text strings currently do. The only place where I
> had any difficulty deciding what a particular datatype should do is with
> the 1-byte "char" type, which has a foot in both camps. I decided to
> treat it as an unconverted single byte (but am willing to listen to
> argument if anyone thinks differently).
One concern I would have is how to get at the raw unconverted text data
without changing the client encoding. I do not really see an advantage in
providing the same thing for text and binary format if it is now
a per column thing. I would do text unconverted if binary format is selected
for that column.
Did COPY BINARY convert text ?
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg | 2003-05-14 14:44:04 | Re: fomatting an interval (resend) |
Previous Message | Sailesh Krishnamurthy | 2003-05-14 07:33:59 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks? |