Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <milimeter(at)163(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias
Date: 2003-04-15 14:25:29
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961F82@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > That seems like a rather poor excuse for not supporting a standard feature
> > that people seem to ask about every week.
>
> Actually, that was the first complaint that I can recall hearing in
> quite some time.

Imho it is well documented, and the answer has always been that it is not easily doable,
so people don't complain, but I guess they are none the less annoyed.

I would vote for doing the change.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 14:35:44 GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-04-15 14:19:11 Re: Are we losing momentum?