Re: DBD::Pg ...

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg ...
Date: 2002-08-22 20:44:14
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961E5F@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > People should really use DBD::Pg (good that it stays on CPAN).
>
> Why do you say that?
>
> Pg's interface seems a bit closer to libpg's interface than DBD::Pg.
> I would think that would be an advantage.

Well libpq is very nonstandard same as interfaces/perl5. Since I like
somewhat portable code, I would allways suggest people use the more standard
interfaces, like DBD::Pg ODBC ECPG.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-22 20:58:19 Re: Making cstring type less pseudo and more real
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-08-22 20:36:29 Re: Release of v7.2.2 (Was: Re: @(#)Mordred Labs ad...)