| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, "Thomas Lockhart" <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: insert statements |
| Date: | 2002-03-18 18:49:45 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961D88@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>
>> I'd want it to error out on "INSERT foo (bar.col)", though ;-)
>>
>
> And on "INSERT foo (bar.foo.col)" as well.
Why accept above at all ? Seems much too error prone, I would eighter
accept table with schema or without schema, mixing both cases seems
unnecessarily confusing and error prone to me.
If at all, I would allow:
INSERT bar.foo (bar.foo.col)
INSERT foo (foo.col)
Would that be enough for the initial problem case ?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro | 2002-03-18 18:58:45 | Re: postgres is not using tas |
| Previous Message | Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro | 2002-03-18 18:32:59 | Re: postgres is not using tas |