| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output |
| Date: | 2002-03-12 16:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961D73@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > > Personally, I think that Tom's code should go into standard EXPLAIN.
> > > >
> > > > I am confused. Which grammar do you like?
> > >
> > > Neither =).
> >
> > OK, would you suggest one?
>
> I don't think there needs to be a grammar change. I think that Tom's
> qualification changes should go into non-verbose EXPLAIN and that pretty
> vs. non-pretty debug just gets handled via debug_print_pretty.
count me in :-)
And if I want it verbose I want it verbose (== gimme all you can tell).
I would not really see a logic to different levels, what goes in which
level ? Seems I would always want to see some detail in each of the
levels.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2002-03-12 16:45:31 | Re: Zlib vulnerability heads-up. |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-03-12 16:34:13 | Re: Zlib vulnerability heads-up. |