| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joe Conway (wwc)" <jconway(at)cox(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Date: | 2002-01-25 21:36:37 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA42128E0@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact
> > name "public" for the public schema.
>
> I wonder if we should think about a 'group' area so people in a group
> can create things that others in the group can see, but not people
> outside the group.
A group simply chooses a special schema name for their group.
Maybe an extra in the ACL area so you can grant privs for a whole
schema.
grant select on schema blabla to "JoeLuser"
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-01-25 21:51:24 | Re: Savepoints |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-01-25 21:03:53 | Re: Savepoints |