Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Joe Conway (wwc)" <jconway(at)cox(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-25 11:34:48
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA42128DD@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >
> > This would be a *whole* lot simpler if we forgot the notion of "any"
> > and made the search order look like
> >
> > (temp, private, public, system)

I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact
name "public" for the public schema.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-01-25 11:51:41 typo in contrib/oid2name
Previous Message Holger Krug 2002-01-25 10:26:24 Re: PostgreSQL crashes with Qmail-SQL