From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
Date: | 2001-12-13 15:47:10 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA421285C@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers |
> > Right, 7.2b4 passes *all* tests both parallel and
> sequential on Windows 2000
> > Server.
> > On XP Pro, and by the sounds of it, any other non-server releases of
> > Windows, parallel tests will fail randomly due to Winsock
> backlog limit of 5
> > on these systems (as pointed out by Jason Tishler and documented in
> > FAQ_MSWIN).
>
> So ignore the question I sent a minute ago. Thanks for the report!!
Problem with this report is, that it most certainly is on a single CPU
system. Problems currently only reproduce on SMP, if I read the mails
correctly.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-12-13 15:52:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-13 15:16:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-12-13 15:52:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2001-12-13 15:44:31 | Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates? |