Re: elog() patch

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() patch
Date: 2002-03-01 19:05:19
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB535@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Maybe I have the ordering wrong for server_min_messages. Perhaps it
> should be:
>
> DEBUG5-1, INFO, NOTICE/WARNING, ERROR, LOG, FATAL, PANIC
>
> Nothing prevents us from doing that. Well, anyway, not sure how much I
> like it but I throw it out as an idea.

Ah, yes, that sounds optimal to me.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-03-01 19:06:35 Re: elog() patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-01 18:50:03 Re: elog() patch