| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2002-02-05 10:45:57 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB4D4@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> If someone wanted to submit appropriate patches for the v7.3 development
> tree, that merge cleanly, I can't see why this wouldn't be a good thing
> ...
I thought that the one thread instead of one process per client model
would only be an advantage for the "native Windows port" ?
Imho a useful threaded model on unix would involve a separation of threads
and clients. ( 1 CPU thread per physical CPU, several IO threads)
But that would involve a complete redesign.
Andreas
> > Are there any plans to merge the sources from the experimental threaded
> > server and the forked server so that a compile switch could choose the
> > model?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-05 10:49:12 | Re: v7.2 rolled last night ... |
| Previous Message | Milan Roubal | 2002-02-05 10:44:32 | Re: v7.2 rolled last night ... |