From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Date: | 2002-01-23 09:11:13 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB4C2@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Switches set to historical:
>
> > schema search path = (user's own schema, "any" schema, postgres)
>
> > [ default creation schema = user's own schema ]
>
> > The searching in "any" schema (i.e., any owner) will let will find
> > things that where defined the way they are today, i.e., possibly
> > by several different users.
>
> No, it won't, because nothing will ever get put into that schema.
> (At least not by existing pg_dump scripts, which are the things that
> really need to see the historical behavior.) The
> default-creation-schema variable has got to point at any/public/
> whatever-we-call it, or you do not have the historical behavior.
When configured for historical behavior would need to:
1. have search path: temp, any, system
2. guard against duplicate table names across all schemas (except temp schema)
Or are you thinking about a per session behavior ?
I would rather envision a per database behavior.
Maybe the easy way out would be a "default creation schema" property for
each user, that would default to the username. If you want everything in one
schema simply alter the users.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vsevolod Lobko | 2002-01-23 09:11:16 | pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-01-23 06:11:21 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |