From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Alex Pilosov" <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, <manieq(at)idea(dot)net(dot)pl> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFD: access to remore databases: altername suggestion |
Date: | 2001-10-03 07:47:19 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB3A3@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> You are attacking here two things:
>
> a) schemas, which should be done in 7.3,
Is imho something different alltogether. (I know we have two opposed
views here)
> thus multiple databases on same host would be unnecessary.
I disagree :-)
>
> b) connections to remote host' databases, which is partially
implemented
> already (in a ugly way, but...) see contrib/dblink
>
> What you described is a syntactic sugar to implement b) which isn't a
bad
> idea, but just consider, it is already done. sorta.
Not in the least. True remote access needs 2 phase commit,
which is nowhere near the horizon. Remote read only access would be
somewhat easier to implement, and would imho be a very useful
first step.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2001-10-03 08:09:46 | Re: Unicode combining characters |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-10-03 07:12:57 | Re: Unicode combining characters |