Re: RFD: access to remore databases: altername suggestion

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Alex Pilosov" <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, <manieq(at)idea(dot)net(dot)pl>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFD: access to remore databases: altername suggestion
Date: 2001-10-03 07:47:19
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB3A3@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> You are attacking here two things:
>
> a) schemas, which should be done in 7.3,

Is imho something different alltogether. (I know we have two opposed
views here)

> thus multiple databases on same host would be unnecessary.

I disagree :-)

>
> b) connections to remote host' databases, which is partially
implemented
> already (in a ugly way, but...) see contrib/dblink
>
> What you described is a syntactic sugar to implement b) which isn't a
bad
> idea, but just consider, it is already done. sorta.

Not in the least. True remote access needs 2 phase commit,
which is nowhere near the horizon. Remote read only access would be
somewhat easier to implement, and would imho be a very useful
first step.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-10-03 08:09:46 Re: Unicode combining characters
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-10-03 07:12:57 Re: Unicode combining characters