Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date: 2004-07-09 10:59:57
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA40184D140@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I'd opt for BEGIN as a start of a subtransaction (no need for special
> semantics in plpgsql), the corresponding END simply changes the
> transaction context to the parent level.

But 'BEGIN' in plpgsql does not start a [sub]transaction, it starts a
statement block. Are we intending to change that ? I think not.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-09 11:15:12 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-09 10:45:04 Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All