Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-04 23:58:19
Message-ID: 46B5129B.9080208@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Page wrote:
>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
>> To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>> Sent: 04/08/07, 22:18:02
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>>
>> O.k. perhaps this is a perception problem. Consider my involvement in
>> the community and the fact that I thought that I had to do all of the
>> above in order to contribute to the site... Now take into account
>> someone who isn't as involved as I?
>
> People from all sorts of places mail their requests to webmaster@ from where they are actioned or pointed in the right direction.
>
> This is fairly standard practice the world over, and works quite well - I even do it internally in EDB. In your case, I would expect you to mail the webteam (-www). I don't understand why this is difficult for you.

It isn't difficult, it is unexpected. You don't manage content via
webmaster@, that is stupid. We are not talking about one off edits for a
spelling mistake here. Now I would concur that -www would make
reasonable sense, but my point, was that we might have a perception
problem. I was trying to be helpful and I repeat:

Where is the, "How to contribute to the PostgreSQL.Org website HOWTO?".

If it doesn't exist, does it by chance make sense to have one? If not,
why not? It isn't like this is the first time people have brought up the
point that it isn't as easy as it could be to contribute to the website.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtRKbATb/zqfZUUQRAulAAJ9bzG5EFbvTm0IpnXeAZovcJNvqoQCghECM
Ynli5N1yLYO62klD5xajkAs=
=HGpm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 23:59:17 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 23:54:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 23:59:17 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-04 23:54:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki