Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Dave Page wrote:
>>> and I am reluctant to go that route anyway for public-facing pages
>>> that represent the project via a
>>> postgresql.org address.
>
> I don't see any need to have any public facing pages on a Wiki - are we
> too lazy to write things up for the website when we want to present them
> to the world? It's not like it's difficult to do.
>
> For collaboration work however, the Wiki is important I think - but I
> agree with Greg, we shouldn't need a second one. Can't we have an area
> on the current one with looser permissions?

Agreed. The whole idea behind a wiki is "reasonably loose permissions",
right? AS Greg already suggested, perhaps we just need a "better way"
for people to request permissions? (For example, right now it just says
"contact greg or neil", but it doesn't tell you how - not even an email
address...)

And a structure of the wiki that has a section for advocacy of course -
but we already have that.

/Magnus