From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux distro |
Date: | 2007-08-02 05:36:14 |
Message-ID: | 46B16D4E.4090807@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/07 22:05, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/01/07 10:37, Owen Hartnett wrote:
>>> At 4:52 PM +0200 8/1/07, Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 1. August 2007 16:15, Madison Kelly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> /Personally/, I love Debian on servers.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not quite as 'hardcore' as Gentoo (a great distro, but not one to
>>>>> start with!). It's the foundation of many of the popular distros
>>>>> (Ubuntu, Mepis, Knoppix, etc) and the Debian crew is very careful
>>>>> about what they put into the 'stable' repositories.
>>>> I agree totally. Debian in a server configuration is quite easy to get
>>>> started with, and is rock solid. My first Linux "test server" (my old
>>>> Pentium 133 MHz desktop) way back in 2002 ran Debian Woody. I kept it
>>>> running until it died from old age a couple of years ago. Later I fell
>>>> in love with Gentoo. But if I'd have to run a server with maximum
>>>> stability and uptime, I think that I'd still prefer Debian.
>>> As an alternative viewpoint, I've been running the latest postgres on
>>> Mac OS X Server 10.4, and it's been great for me. It was my first time
>>> using a server, and my first serious use of postgres (although I have
>>> had a lot of previous unix experience.) All the power of unix, all the
>>> ease of the Macintosh (and it's server installation gives you lots of
>> Pardon me for being the contrarian, but why does a server need a
>> GUI? Isn't that just extra RAM & CPU overhead that could be more
>> profitably put to use powering the application?
>
> A server with a GUI sitting on a login screen is wasting zero
> resources. Some enterprise management tools are in java which require
> a GUI to use so there is very little downside to installing X, so IMO
> a lightweight window manager is appropriate...a full gnome is maybe
> overkill. Obviously, you want to turn of the 3d screen saver :-)
X is network-transparent.
Load the few necessary X libraries (Debian's packages are granular
enough to do this), and then use the GUI on your workstation to run
all those foolish GUI-based server (in a room down the hall, across
town or across the country, with compressed X) apps.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGsW1OS9HxQb37XmcRAoUYAKCZqXlRD9LmVIXHLuPe3YhWxJzppQCghP5x
zCLmJdjJLz+NnyMlwNGJG5E=
=f6TY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2007-08-02 05:36:41 | Re: Linux distro |
Previous Message | Madison Kelly | 2007-08-02 05:19:12 | Re: Linux distro |