Re: Slow query with backwards index scan

From: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: Tilmann Singer <tils-pgsql(at)tils(dot)net>
Cc: andrew(at)pillette(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
Date: 2007-07-28 20:06:02
Message-ID: 46ABA1AA.7020701@emolecules.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tilmann Singer wrote:
> * andrew(at)pillette(dot)com <andrew(at)pillette(dot)com> [20070728 21:05]:
>> Let's try putting the sort/limit in each piece of the UNION to speed them up separately.
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (
>> (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>> WHERE lt.user_id = 12345
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q1
>> UNION
>> (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>> WHERE user_id IN (SELECT contact_id FROM relationships WHERE user_id=12345)
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q2
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10;
>
> It's not possible to use ORDER BY or LIMIT within unioned queries.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-select.html#SQL-UNION

If I'm reading this documentation correctly, it *is* possible, as long as they're inside of a sub-select, as in this case.

Craig

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Rodrigues Siqueira 2007-07-28 20:12:10 RES: select on 1milion register = 6s
Previous Message Craig James 2007-07-28 19:59:26 Re: select on 1milion register = 6s