From: | Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)wizmail(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow query with backwards index scan |
Date: | 2007-07-28 19:40:12 |
Message-ID: | 46AB9B9C.8070009@wizmail.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tilmann Singer wrote:
> * andrew(at)pillette(dot)com <andrew(at)pillette(dot)com> [20070728 21:05]:
>> Let's try putting the sort/limit in each piece of the UNION to speed them up separately.
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (
>> (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>> WHERE lt.user_id = 12345
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q1
>> UNION
>> (SELECT * FROM large_table lt
>> WHERE user_id IN (SELECT contact_id FROM relationships WHERE user_id=12345)
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10) AS q2
>> ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 10;
>
> It's not possible to use ORDER BY or LIMIT within unioned queries.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-select.html#SQL-UNION
"ORDER BY and LIMIT can be attached to a subexpression if it is enclosed in parentheses"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hervé Piedvache | 2007-07-28 19:56:58 | Re: select on 1milion register = 6s |
Previous Message | Bruno Rodrigues Siqueira | 2007-07-28 19:27:14 | select on 1milion register = 6s |