Re: stats_block_level

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stats_block_level
Date: 2007-07-26 21:39:55
Message-ID: 46A914AB.5020001@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> So maybe the *real* question to ask is why we have separate GUCs for
> stats_row_level and stats_block_level. Shouldn't we fold them into a
> single switch? It's hard to see what having just one of them turned on
> will save.

Any reason not to just fold them both into stats_start_collector ?

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-26 22:23:51 default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-26 21:03:37 Re: stats_block_level