| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
| Date: | 2007-07-24 12:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | 46A5F162.7060705@janestcapital.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:12:07AM -0300, Guido Barosio wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cioupdate.com/trends/article.php/3689871
>>
>>Only one database there, MySQL, wtf.
>>
>>
>
>To quote...
>
>"To come up with its Top 20 list, OpenLogic, a provider of open source
>solutions that help its 700 Global 2000 enterprise customers acquire,
>support, track and control open source software, queries its customers
>as to which open source software projects they are using."
>
>The reason MySQL shows and PostgreSQL doesn't is that there's all kinds
>of other OSS projects that use MySQL, so it ends up in the door that
>way. It's also got way more people that know it.
>
>PostgreSQL OTOH typically only goes into an organization if they either
>run into problems they can't solve in MySQL or if there's a (loud)
>internal advocate.
>
>This is why I disagree with the notion that MySQL isn't our
>competition... this shows how it's popularity ends up hurting us.
>
>
I also find it humorous that vim made the list, but emacs didn't. Note
that I'm a vim user, not an emacs user, so I'm only "amused", not
"annoyed". But it does make me question the accuracy of the list.
Brian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-07-24 13:48:35 | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects inthe Enterprise |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-24 06:49:39 | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects inthe Enterprise |