Re: TRUNCATE TABLE

From: Adriaan van Os <postgres(at)microbizz(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE TABLE
Date: 2007-07-18 07:36:45
Message-ID: 469DC30D.3060603@microbizz.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:

> Thus the timing issue (at least as exhibited by this script) has nothing
> whatever to do with the time to delete a file, but with the time to
> create one. Since the part of DROP being timed has probably got no I/O
> involved at all (the tuples being touched are almost surely still in
> shared buffers), it's unsurprising that it is consistently fast.

In my original profiling, CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE/DROP TABLE wasn't much faster than TRUNCATE TABLE.
When I try it again now, I see that DROP TABLE is consistently fast, while the timings of CREATE
TEMPORARY TABLE vary as much as those of TRUNCATE TABLE. Your observations on the time needed to
open a file confirm that, I think.

In my test databases, autovacuum is off.

Regards,

Adriaan van Os

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-07-18 08:57:15 Re: importance of fast disks with pg
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-07-17 22:29:32 ionice to make vacuum friendier?