Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Date: 2007-07-13 16:44:08
Message-ID: 4697ABD8.2030705@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Derek Rodner wrote:
> Bill,

> There are some issues, however, like our performance claim, that could
> cause some community members to have concern to be upset with us. In
> those cases, I want to know!!! You can go to the core team and Bruce

I have said this before. If you are faster, prove it. Then there is
nothing anyone can complain about :). That is the problem in a nutshell,
you "say" you are faster. There are no metrics, no test data, no
benchmarks, no specifications not even a pretty graph :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-13 16:48:44 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL related pressrelease
Previous Message Robert Treat 2007-07-13 16:39:57 Re: Regarding Distributed Database features