Re: postgresql 7.2b5 and vserver: statistics sockets

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: postgresql(at)fruru(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql 7.2b5 and vserver: statistics sockets
Date: 2002-01-23 19:16:57
Message-ID: 4694.1011813417@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

<postgresql(at)fruru(dot)com> writes:
>> That might be a good argument in general, but it does not apply to
>> Postgres' use of 127.0.0.1, because we bind that socket to its own
>> address, so only packets out of the same socket will be received.

> What you're saying is that it shouldn't really matter whether you use
> 127.0.0.1, the ipv6 ::1 or another ipv4 or 6 address (but that's another
> can of worms :-).

As long as it's routed to our own machine, no it doesn't matter. But
AFAIK there is no other generally-accepted loopback address.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Ferguson 2002-01-23 19:32:43 Re: Unrecognized language Error
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-23 19:08:41 Re: Unrecognized language Error