| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept |
| Date: | 2007-07-03 18:37:05 |
| Message-ID: | 468A9751.9050308@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Again, you are setting yourself up for complete failure if you insist
> on having every possible nicety in the first version. An incremental
> approach is far more likely to succeed than a "big bang".
Yes, I know. I don't want to solve everything in one patch. I just
looking forward and I'm trying to summarize complexity of problem. I
will not want to stay on dead road and say ups after couple of months of
development ...
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-07-03 18:45:33 | Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 18:27:07 | Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept |