From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kgrittn(dot)CCAP(dot)Courts(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Date: | 2007-07-03 22:22:26 |
Message-ID: | 468A85D1.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2007 at 5:17 PM, in message
<468A84A1(dot)EE98(dot)0025(dot)0(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Kevin Grittner"
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>
> We have a 406GB table where 304GB is in one table. The next two tables
It's probably obvious, but I meant a 406GB database. Sorry.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-03 22:34:02 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-07-03 22:17:38 | Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-03 22:34:02 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-07-03 22:17:22 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |