From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
Date: | 2007-07-03 04:18:34 |
Message-ID: | 4689CE1A.2010402@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
>>>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html :
>>> Well, with autovac defaulting to ON in 8.3, that's certainly obsolete
>>> text now.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason to say anything beyond "use autovac"?
>> Did we change the default autovac parameters for 8.3 (beyond turning it
>> on?) because on any reasonably used database, they are way to conservative.
>
> We're still on time to change them ... Any concrete proposals?
I could provide numbers from production high use databases. We could
probably back those down a little and make more reasonable numbers.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-07-03 05:08:36 | Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-03 04:11:56 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-07-03 05:50:27 | Re: [DOCS] rename of a view |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-03 04:11:56 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |