Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3
Date: 2007-06-22 21:22:15
Message-ID: 467C3D87.2060301@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Greg Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Greg had worried about being able to turn this behavior off, so we'd
>> still need at least a bool, and we might as well expose the fraction
>> instead. I agree with removing the non-LRU part of the bgwriter's
>> write logic though
>
> If you accept that being able to turn LDC off is important, people who
> aren't turning it on may still want the existing bgwriter_all_* settings
> so they can keep running things the way they are now. It's certainly
> reasonable to skip that code path when doing things the LDC way.

Well, if you don't want anything to change, don't upgrade.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henry B. Hotz 2007-06-23 01:35:57 Re: Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-06-22 21:19:57 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3