Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Date: 2007-06-21 23:10:32
Message-ID: 467B0568.9040001@g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives,
>> with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage. 15,000 RPM. It would be
>> hard to get more/faster disk than that.
>>
>
> What kind of RAID? It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in
> RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM. The rotation speed is the least
> of your problems in many RAID implementations.
>
Also, the controller means a lot. I'd rather have a 4 disk RAID-10 with
an Areca card with BBU Cache than a 16 disk RAID 5 on an adaptec (with
or without cache... :) )

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-06-21 23:11:04 Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Previous Message Dimitri 2007-06-21 22:38:40 Re: Data transfer very slow when connected via DSL