From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: EOL characters and multibyte encodings |
Date: | 2007-06-21 22:39:28 |
Message-ID: | 467AFE20.3040902@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote:
> I finally was able PL/R to compile and run on Windows recently. This
> has lead to people using a Windows based client (typically PgAdmin
> III) to create PL/R functions. Immediately I started to receive
> reports of failures that turned out to be due to the carriage return
> (\r) used in standard Win32 EOLs (\r\n). It seems that the R parser
> only accepts newlines (\n), even on Win32 (confirmed on r-devel list
> with a core developer).
>
> My first thought on fixing this issue was to simply replace all
> instances of '\r' in pg_proc.prosrc with '\n' prior to sending it to
> the R parser. As far as I know, any instances of '\r' embedded in a
> syntactically valid R statement must be escaped (i.e. literally the
> characters "\" and "r"), so that should not be a problem. But I am
> concerned about how this potentially plays against multibyte
> characters. Is it safe to do this, or do I need to use a mb-aware
> replace algorithm?
>
>
Didn't we just settle that all the server-side encodings have to be
ASCII supersets? In which case, just removing the CRs should be quite safe.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2007-06-21 22:51:13 | Re: EOL characters and multibyte encodings |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-21 22:38:46 | Re: EOL characters and multibyte encodings |