From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3 |
Date: | 2007-06-21 08:14:54 |
Message-ID: | 467A337E.4050901@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> The only thing I don't understand is the naming of 'checkpoint_smoothing'.
> Can users imagine the unit of 'smoothing' is a fraction?
>
> You explain the paremeter with the word 'fraction'.
> Why don't you simply name it 'checkpoint_fraction' ?
> | Specifies the target length of checkpoints, as a fraction of
> | the checkpoint interval. The default is 0.3.
I chose checkpoint_smoothing because it tells you what the parameter is
for. If you want more smoothing, tune it up, and if you want less, tune
it down. checkpoint_fraction makes you wonder what you can do with it
and why you would change it.
> Sorry if I'm missing discussions abount the naming.
No, I chose _smoothing on my own. People didn't like
checkpoint_write_percent either (including).
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-06-21 08:32:52 | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3 |
Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-06-21 03:27:22 | Re: DROP TABLE and autovacuum |