| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Hunt <huntc(at)internode(dot)on(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Literal vs parameterized 'timestamp with time zone' value |
| Date: | 2007-06-18 12:46:59 |
| Message-ID: | 46767EC3.3020505@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Christopher Hunt wrote:
> However if I use a parameter:
>
> PreparedStatement sqlStatement =
> sqlConnection.prepareStatement("select validtime from
> moving_object_status where validtime < ?");
> int columnIndex = 1;
> sqlStatement.setString(columnIndex++, "2005-06-08T20:05:45.825+0");
>
> No rows are returned.
>
> Can anyone explain the difference in results given a literal value and a
> parameterised value in this context?
I don't really have an explanation, but I would recommend using
setTimestamp instead of setString for timestamp values.
Maybe there's a time or timezone difference between client and server,
and in the former case the server setting is used, and in the latter,
the client setting?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2007-06-18 12:51:24 | Re: Literal vs parameterized 'timestamp with time zone' value |
| Previous Message | Christopher Hunt | 2007-06-18 12:41:07 | Re: Literal vs parameterized 'timestamp with time zone' value |